Reasoning of "Hours Shaving" Pattern (Analysis #5)

Any time a pattern of shorter than 8 hours per day is consistently reported (or 7 hours per work day for some trades) it could indicate a systematic "hours shaving" practice.  This might be a straight method of paying for less hours than worked, or it could also signal a "Piece Work Back In" scheme. Generally, workers will not tolerate working short days continuously as there is a well established benefit from working "full days". 

The "hours shaving" scheme is one of the most common cheating practices known and also one of the hardest to prove.  However, this practice can be detered by informing the contractors that the jobsite record of work type and time is a requirement of the law (refer to "Daily Time Record" Analysis) and by checking the start and end time at the project on a regular basis. In addition should an audit be deemed necessary paycheck stubs may be reviewed for further comparison. The Inspector Of Record (IOR), though obligated to note the quantity of workers on site, is not obligated to note the exact quantity of time worked.