Classroom Introduction

In the following pages you will find many graphics and explanations dealing with the various aspects of a Certified Payroll Report Form (CPR) for California Public Works Projects.  For the contractor or bookkeeper responsible for producing these reports, the main focus in this tutorial is on those elements which are necessary for a complete disclosure of the payroll itself which, if not thoroughly done, may lead to delays in payment and possible audit. There are many other information items required on the CPR which are not necessarily addressed in these pages yet should also be taken into account. (Click here for complete list.) For the labor compliance review person, these pages show various relationships of hours and per diem wages and other important information which must be reviewed in order to complete a thorough payroll analysis. For a “used by permission” agreement to utilize these copyrighted pages please contact us.

Classroom Analysis Description
The page gives an overview of  the Cal-LCP example of a public works payroll report which satisfies California Law.  On this page there is also a brief explanation of the purpose of a "California-Standard" Certfied Payroll Report.
Blowup of the area of the actual California State form is compared to the same area on the Cal-LCP form. 
Concepts
This page explains and illustrates IMPORTANT CONCEPTS of CPR Analysis.
#1
Analysis #1 is the first step in verifying that the prevailing wage has been paid. This analysis illustrates why it's critical that all taxable wages and untaxed contributions are reported fully and accurately.
#1.1
Analysis #1.1 verifies that the actual wage paid to the worker on the paycheck is at, or above, the minimum amount required by law.
#2

Analysis #2 verifies that no improper deductions have been made.  This analysis relies on the "gross amount for all projects" wage amount as does Analysis #3.

#3
Analysis #3 checks the wage payment ratios for detection of a potentially unlawful payroll calculation system using one job to supplement the cost of another. 
#4
Analysis #4 covers the verification of the correct training contribution rate and and total for all work on "this project" for the week.  If a worker works under more than one classification, separate training contribution accounts must be shown.
#5
Analysis #5 concerns the detection of patterns of short workdays on a regular and continuous basis which suggests either simple hours shaving or "piece work back in" schemes. The detection of an odd pattern would indicate audit and investigation follow-up.
#6
Analysis #6 focuses on the practice of issuance of separate payroll checks for public works and private works projects during the same payroll period.  When this practice is used, the reporting must include both amounts as shown on the illustrations. Caution: tax law violations may occur with this method!
#7
Analysis #7 relates to the issue of "annualization" of contribution credits.  When credits against the prevailing wage are taken through contributions to employee benefit funds, the amount per hour taken as a credit must be "annualized".
#7.1
Analysis #7.1 refers to the somewhat obscure area of a prevailing wage determination which covers worker compensation for projects outside the home area. 
#8
Analysis #8 is designed to detect the improper practice of paying a lump sum amount for "salary" or "piecework" for work done on a public works project. These amounts may not be converted into a "per hour-per diem" method for reporting.
Labor Code §1812 requires a daily record of work on the project as illustrated on this page.
  Labor Code §226(a)(9) requires hours and different rates per hour to be shown on the payroll check statement given to the worker. 

 

 
home | about us | contact us | cpr tutorial | news
© 2005-2006 Labor Compliance Specialists, Inc. All Rights Reserved